In which the author waxes wroth concerning marketing of audio-visual adaptations
I just saw something which irritated me enough that I had to vent about it somewhere.
I was at the video store and saw DVDs of the TV adaptation of Terry Pratchett's novel, Hogfather. So far, so good.
But the DVD case has a tagline "In the tradition of Lemony Snickets and Harry Potter!"
In the tradition? In the tradition?
Hogfather is the 20th book in the Discworld series. It was published in 1996.
The first Harry Potter book was published in 1997.
The first Lemony Snickett book in the "Series of Unfortunate Events" was published in 1999.
Now, I realise that Harry Potter and Lemony Snickett made it to the cinemas, which Pratchett still hasn't done, and a few years before this TV adaptation came out.
But seriously: give the guy some damn respect. It wouldn't be fair to say that Harry Potter and Lemony Snickett are in Pratchett's tradition; after all they're children's books. But it sure as heck isn't fair to make Hogfather out to be some derivative work riding in Rowling & Snicket's coat tails!
Argh.
I was at the video store and saw DVDs of the TV adaptation of Terry Pratchett's novel, Hogfather. So far, so good.
But the DVD case has a tagline "In the tradition of Lemony Snickets and Harry Potter!"
In the tradition? In the tradition?
Hogfather is the 20th book in the Discworld series. It was published in 1996.
The first Harry Potter book was published in 1997.
The first Lemony Snickett book in the "Series of Unfortunate Events" was published in 1999.
Now, I realise that Harry Potter and Lemony Snickett made it to the cinemas, which Pratchett still hasn't done, and a few years before this TV adaptation came out.
But seriously: give the guy some damn respect. It wouldn't be fair to say that Harry Potter and Lemony Snickett are in Pratchett's tradition; after all they're children's books. But it sure as heck isn't fair to make Hogfather out to be some derivative work riding in Rowling & Snicket's coat tails!
Argh.